My guess is that it's going to bother someone's tax dollars right into that kids hands...suthdj wrote: I guess it is a win-win he got to bother them and they got to bother him.
It's always interesting for me to see the balance on this forum. We've got some pretty die hard constitutionalists focused on 2nd amendment rights. So what happened to that AR-15 guy in Temple is a major crime, but this kid getting the treatment is somehow a differently bar... I guess the kid didn't get arrested, so that's good for him.
It seems like we're trying hard to have it both ways. We're definitely giving up some rights and privacy's that were guaranteed in the Constitution for the sake of a safer country or perhaps in this case, a safer street.
We can either have privacy or we accept the risk that comes with law enforcement being unable to search your car, your bag, or stop you at will... The courts will draw the lines for us through caselaw eventually and technology will help make things a little less one sided, but I wish it was a choice rather than a process.