In the eyes of Texas law, they do.anygunanywhere wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:23 pmSorry. I couldn't resist. Badges don't grant special privileges.DynamicDan wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:18 pm The first thing a company should tell their employees is that CITIZENS are allowed to carry their weapons at all times. Enough of this stupid nonsense.
Search found 3 matches
- Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:38 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Kay Jewelers store manager no longer employed after keeping on-duty deputy from picking up ring
- Replies: 29
- Views: 8244
Re: Kay Jewelers store manager no longer employed after keeping on-duty deputy from picking up ring
- Fri Jun 07, 2019 2:46 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Kay Jewelers store manager no longer employed after keeping on-duty deputy from picking up ring
- Replies: 29
- Views: 8244
Re: Kay Jewelers store manager no longer employed after keeping on-duty deputy from picking up ring
Kay's and all the other places that post 30.06/7 signs and then try to prohibit peace officers from carrying will have the likelihood of an expensive education if HB 2164 is signed:
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Hi ... ill=HB2164
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Hi ... ill=HB2164
An establishment serving the public that violates this article is subject to a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 for each violation. The attorney general may sue to collect a civil penalty under this section. Money collected under this subsection shall be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the general revenue fund.
- Fri Jun 07, 2019 1:42 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Kay Jewelers store manager no longer employed after keeping on-duty deputy from picking up ring
- Replies: 29
- Views: 8244
Re: Kay Jewelers store manager no longer employed after keeping on-duty deputy from picking up ring
Raise school kids with a 0 tolerance policy towards weapons and no understanding of the law and this is exactly the result you get: Misinformed mindless zealots who will enforce "company policy" without any critical thinking.ELB wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 1:38 pmGiven the ludicrousness of this incident, the manager may have already had a track record of midjudgment and keeping the cop out was the boulder that broke the camel's back.WildBill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 1:12 pmrotor wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:18 pm I don't know all the details from the article but it sounds like the manager may have been following Kay policy. It was an easy scapegoat to fire the manager after a social media notation. So Kay Jewelers has an anti-gun policy, the manager follows orders and gets fired. Kay Jewelers then looks good. Not to me.No need to fire the guy IMO. I am sure that the former manager would change his behavior if the owners reminded him of the correct policy.