Search found 2 matches

by Papa_Tiger
Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:52 am
Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Replies: 27
Views: 18598

Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
steveincowtown wrote:I guess Texas' strong policy toward private property rights is selective.
Any private property owner, including a business owner, can still put a circle-slash badge sticker on their door and completely ban everyone who has a badge, including LEO's. After all, circle-slash stickers have the force of law under 30.05 unless an exemption has been made, such as under 30.06 and 30.07 for LTC holders.
TPC 30.05(i) has something to say about that:
TPC 30.05 wrote:(i) This section does not apply if:

(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun or other weapon was forbidden; and

(2) the actor at the time of the offense was a peace officer, including a commissioned peace officer of a recognized state, or a special investigator under Article 2.122, Code of Criminal Procedure, regardless of whether the peace officer or special investigator was engaged in the actual discharge of an official duty while carrying the weapon.
by Papa_Tiger
Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:05 am
Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
Replies: 27
Views: 18598

Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?

steveincowtown wrote:I guess Texas' strong policy toward private property rights is selective.


I know it is probably to early, but man this session has me jaded. The need to turn the Texas Capital into a zoo so that kids can some see Rinos up close and personal. :biggrinjester:
But then would it become off limits to those with an LTC since it is an educational institution? :biggrinjester:

Return to “Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?”