Buh-byeRafe wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:57 pm Breaking News:
Green Day frontman Billie Joe Armstrong says he'll renounce his US citizenship over Roe decision
https://abc13.com/billie-joe-armstrong- ... /11998421/
LONDON -- Green Day frontman Billie Joe Armstrong has told fans at a concert that he intends to renounce his United States citizenship following the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade -- a controversial move that eliminates the federal constitutional right to abortion nationwide.
During a performance as part of the band's Hella Mega tour at the London Stadium in the UK on Friday, Armstrong expressed his frustration as he told the crowd: "[Unprintable] America. I'm [unprintable] renouncing my citizenship. I'm [unprintable] coming here."
Ohmygosh! Whatever will the United States do without recovering drug addict Billie Joe Armstrong living here? I just...can't imagine it!
Remember all the "celebrities" who swore they were leaving the U.S. if Trump won in 2016? Did any of them actually leave and renounce their citizenship? Odious idiots...
Search found 3 matches
Re: SCOTUS
Re: SCOTUS
18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or paradingphilip964 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 8:52 pm White House encourages 'peaceful protests,' won't tell abortion activists to avoid SCOTUS justices' homes
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white- ... tice-homes
Leftist’s doxed the fives home addresses.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507
Re: SCOTUS
If a staffer, needs to be imprisoned without bail in isolation until trial in a couple years. If a justice, needs to be impeached and removed then the same fate as the staffer.AF-Odin wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 6:47 pm I believe that Flightmare has hit the nail on the head. This is an attempt to garner enough attention and dissent to cause one of the Justices to possibly change their vote. However, I really do not believe that will not happen. What NEEDS to happen is for Roberts to ferret out who the leaker is and if it is a staffer and not one of the Justices, the staffer needs to be immediately fired. If it was one of the Justices, the Chief Justice needs to censure the offender. Supreme Court deliberations are supposed to be private. One scholar I was listening to today stated that this has only occurred twice in well over 100 years. the first was in 1919 and the second was in 1973 regarding the initial RvW ruling.