Dorm population is more the contending arguments which is not your graduate students and seniors...3dfxMM wrote:Graduate students and seniors make up just over 50% of UT Austin's student population. A large percentage of those will be old enough to get their CHL. Also, a large percentage of the faculty and staff will be old enough as well. Of course, old enough does not necessarily equate to eligible.RogueUSMC wrote:I had a conversation yesterday with someone who I consider to be an intelligent young man.
The conversation moved to the open carry and campus carry legislation that is being considered.
Friend: "I am all for open carry but I don't think campus carry is such a good idea."
Me: "how so?"
Friend: "I just don't think it's a good idea to let all those college kids carry guns."
Me: "they have to have a license to carry and they have to be old enough for the license which results in those students carrying guns to be a very minuscule percentage."
Friend: "oh, you have to have a license?"
Me: *thinking, "DUH!"* but what I actually said, "of course it would be restricted to license holders."
Now, I am wondering how this could be misunderstood...but that led to HOW MUCH is this misunderstood? I guess what I consider a 'DUH' isn't so much of a 'DUH'?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Campus carry misunderstood??”
- Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:39 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Campus carry misunderstood??
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1679
Re: Campus carry misunderstood??
- Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:49 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Campus carry misunderstood??
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1679
Campus carry misunderstood??
I had a conversation yesterday with someone who I consider to be an intelligent young man.
The conversation moved to the open carry and campus carry legislation that is being considered.
Friend: "I am all for open carry but I don't think campus carry is such a good idea."
Me: "how so?"
Friend: "I just don't think it's a good idea to let all those college kids carry guns."
Me: "they have to have a license to carry and they have to be old enough for the license which results in those students carrying guns to be a very minuscule percentage."
Friend: "oh, you have to have a license?"
Me: *thinking, "DUH!"* but what I actually said, "of course it would be restricted to license holders."
Now, I am wondering how this could be misunderstood...but that led to HOW MUCH is this misunderstood? I guess what I consider a 'DUH' isn't so much of a 'DUH'?
The conversation moved to the open carry and campus carry legislation that is being considered.
Friend: "I am all for open carry but I don't think campus carry is such a good idea."
Me: "how so?"
Friend: "I just don't think it's a good idea to let all those college kids carry guns."
Me: "they have to have a license to carry and they have to be old enough for the license which results in those students carrying guns to be a very minuscule percentage."
Friend: "oh, you have to have a license?"
Me: *thinking, "DUH!"* but what I actually said, "of course it would be restricted to license holders."
Now, I am wondering how this could be misunderstood...but that led to HOW MUCH is this misunderstood? I guess what I consider a 'DUH' isn't so much of a 'DUH'?