TexasCHLforum.com

JP171 wrote: Rogue misguided child, if the arrest was illegal, arbitrary and capricious and malicious in its intent then she is not guilty of interfering or resisting and the DA should have never accepted charges to begin with.

Ok dude...no need to be condescending...

If they have cause to arrest you, the conduct of the officer going to arrest you has no bearing on whether she is guilty or innocent of the original crime. if the crime you committed stemmed from the officer's conduct, that is different...but it still is not germain until guilt or innocence is established.

That being said, I am just going to block you and spare myself irritation from future interaction with you.

Have a blessed day.

I see that her guilt or innocence has no bearing on the investigation as to his conduct...

Likewise, his conduct has no bearing on whether she is guilty or innocent of other charges...

Once guilt in either case is determined, it really can only be introduced to effect credibility of that individual's character...it can't be used until it is determined.

Not that I'm on this guy's side but...

Constitutionally, he is innocent until proven guilty. Charges don't constitute guilt and would taint the other case were it admitted...