If I'm in the middle of making dinner and realize that I'm out of eggs, I don't want to have to decide between being defenseless at the grocery store near my house or driving an extra thirty minutes round trip to the grocery store that hasn't banned concealed carry. I'm less interested in making a political statement every time I choose a restaurant or a coffee shop or a grocery store than in being able to defend myself wherever my day-to-day activities may take me. I think some Texas CHL holders take for granted how relatively easy it is to work around the <1% of businesses that currently post 30.06.Oldgringo wrote:We'll just eat at the other half....or home, eh?hillfighter wrote:This is not going to end well for gun owners. Businesses that didn't post a discreet gunbuster sign to ban visible guns will read the newspaper article and post large IYF signs that only bans hidden guns. Mark my words, by the time Memorial Day weekend is over, half the restaurants in Texas will have 30.06 signs.
Search found 7 matches
Return to “Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement”
- Sun May 25, 2014 9:50 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Re: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Require
- Sun May 25, 2014 5:40 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Re: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Require
And they couldn't have asked for a stronger impetus.jimlongley wrote:Tic Tac wrote:Hopefully this is a wakeup call for the people who thought Morons Demand Attention were reacting to open carry protests. Their detailed knowledge of 30.06 and attack on same revealed the truth. A sign to ban open carry (except police, military, and security guards) is simple.
So simple even a Moron can do it.![]()
This is not a knee jerk response to a single situation, it is a carefully crafted campaign that they were waiting for the right impetus to trot out.
- Sun May 25, 2014 5:38 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Re: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Require
Whom are you addressing? Where did anyone claim that having a CHL gives him/her a right to trespass on your property?tbrown wrote:Cool story bro but having a CHL doesn't give you a right to trespass on my property. I got purple paint and everything.
- Sat May 24, 2014 9:12 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Re: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Require
Texas Penal Code Section 30.05:Jaguar wrote:Okay, change 30.05(d)(3)(B) as well.stavos wrote:The penalty for regular trespassing is the same if you're armed.Jaguar wrote:30.06 signs have to be big and properly worded because the penalty for disregarding them is so large, i.e. $4,000.00 fine and 1 year in jail plus loss of CHL. Now if the requirements are changed and any little sticker makes it a Class A, CHL will basically be gone in Texas and only good for carrying out of state.
If they do change the sign requirements they should make the violation a Class C misdemeanor with a $10 fine for each violation. That would make it fair once again. Of course I would rather see them keep the current sign and still lower the penalty.
I am pretty sure a "No Shirts, No Shoes" violation does not carry such harsh penalties.
Sec. 30.05. (d) An offense under this section is: (3) a Class A misdemeanor if: (B) the person carries a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense.
Sec. 30.06. (d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun.
- Sat May 24, 2014 10:29 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Re: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Require
I'm pretty sure the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Rural Affairs and Homeland Security is still working on their interim study on "removing barriers to Second Amendment rights." Perhaps we should each drop them a line and let them know how important the current 30.06 rules are to the integrity of Texas's concealed carry laws.
- Fri May 23, 2014 10:27 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Re: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Require
An earlier story/article on the matter:
http://www.click2houston.com/news/group ... s/26083696" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.click2houston.com/news/group ... s/26083696" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Fri May 23, 2014 10:19 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7157
Moms Demand Action Seeks to Change 30.06 Signage Requirement
HOUSTON, TX – Ever see the signs – “No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service!’? simple enough to get the point across; but in Texas if you want to put up a sign that says “No guns!” it isn’t so simple.
“It has to be exactly this sign. Which is eye catching for all the wrong reasons. It has to have exactly these words, be exactly this size of lettering it has to fit exactly these requirements,” said Alexandra Chasse with Moms Demand Action, owner of the 3 foot by 4 foot sign.
Read more: http://newsfixnow.com/2014/05/20/moms-d ... z32YJBQdlJ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;