That seems a little fishy. Whey would they do ballistics testing on the gun unless they had some sort of cause to do so? I hardly think being in an accident is reason to run ballistics testing on a gun that had no association with a crime, especially one owned by a CHLer.BadCo45ACP wrote:A friend w/ a CHL was in an acident last year. He was transported while unconscious, to the hospital. The HPD officer on the scene took possesion of his handgun. My friend had to file some kind of paper work to get it back. WHen it was returrned, all except one round of the ammo was gone. When he asked what happened to the rest he was told that they had done ballstic tests, and since the ammo was fragible they had a hard time getting a good round to look at.
EDIT: and then I read further down and find that everyone already made this point.
Nothing to see here, move along...