Actually, you should never ASSume. I have read some of the court decisions.JP171 wrote:have you actually read any of the court decisions? no I thought not, go back and read them, the supreme court rendered a decision that the second amendment affirms a RIGHT of the PEOPLE. doesn't bother to read loves conspiracy theories, ok your on ignoreStrat9mm wrote:I never thought of it that way.
I have to say that requiring anyone to get a license to carry, open or otherwise, would seem to be a defacto infringement.
The courts have ruled the right pertains to the military, but the word used in the document, is PEOPLE.
It was PEOPLE who armed themselves, ordinary CITIZENS with their own weapons, who formed the militias, not the other way around. That point seems to have been overlooked for some reason.
Just because someone is in the judiciary, doesn't mean they are qualified, or will render sound UNBIASED decisions in DEFENSE of the Constitution.
It sure seems as if bribery, undue influence, and problems rending UNBIASED decisions which UPHOLD the Constitution have been problems from the beginning.
That much has become painfully obvious.
I'm not sure why you're arguing against what I wrote, since you basically made my point with your second sentence.
As for your final sentence, what 'theories' have I espoused, -exactly-?
The people who put others on 'ignore', are the very ones who can't make their own arguments in a logical, or coherent manner. Instead of directly addressing what someone has written or said, and making their point, they put people on ignore, or make statements which do NOT address the topic(s) at hand.
Then again, are some topics which some people seem to have a complete inability to process in a rational way.
Perhaps you believe no one in our government or judiciary has ever taken a bribe?
Perhaps you believe that we all need to submit to laws which require us to register ourselves with I.D. cards just to be able to carry firearms on our persons.
Perhaps you believe that 'moderate' muslims are a peaceful bunch, and are our best of friends. John McCain made a serious error when he stated that all the Syrian rebels are 'moderates'. 1) They're not, so he lied to all of us and 2) Moderate muslims still detest and hate the West, Christians and Jews.
Feel free to try to prove which of my statements are 'conspiracy theories'.
But I don't know what you believe, other than in the 2nd Amendment, and I'm not going to waste any time perusing through your posts to decipher your beliefs, because someone's head is stuck just way too far.. well... perhaps we can both assume how best to finish that last sentence, since others will have to read this post to you.
If people can't make cogent and logical arguments, then perhaps they should let those who can, do.
Just because someone states a fact that you disagree with, doesn't make it a (conspiracy) theory.