TexasCHLforum.com

C-dub wrote:

twomillenium wrote:

C-dub wrote:

twomillenium wrote:

C-dub wrote:Due to recent court rulings, the only time this might be dicey is if there is a school sporting event going on there. Some schools don't have their own athletic fields and have agreements to use the city parks fields for games.

In those instances, notice should be given.

I don't agree with the recent ruling and I don't think many here do. However, in the situation I described I don't now why they would be required to give notice. Maybe I've forgotten that part, but I don't think schools are required to give notice. That's one of the biggest problems with that latest ruling. Cities cannot post, generally, and schools don't need to and probably don't know much about the law that requires other businesses to post. It's a mess.

Schools don't have to give notice in the school, If they are using a city park for an athletic event then they should give notice of the event. An LTC holder who is responsible would know that they cannot carry there.
PC 46.05 states "(2) on the premises where a high school, collegiate, or professional sporting event or interscholastic event is taking place, unless the license holder is a participant in the event and a handgun is used in the event."
INAL but I do not believe the whole park would be off limits because a field in one part of the park is being used for an interscholastic event. If the field is used for public use also then that is where notice that the event is taking place. I see a defense of prosecution if the LTC holder was unaware and no effort to make them aware of what was going on. Again INAL

But is there anything that requires them to give notice? That's my point about how dicey this can be and how problematic this latest ruling is that the park or museum or whatever that isn't controlled or owned by the school could be off limits at all because of a school event.

I am not aware of thet requirement. That is why I said that it could be a defense of prosecution.

C-dub wrote:

twomillenium wrote:

C-dub wrote:Due to recent court rulings, the only time this might be dicey is if there is a school sporting event going on there. Some schools don't have their own athletic fields and have agreements to use the city parks fields for games.

In those instances, notice should be given.

I don't agree with the recent ruling and I don't think many here do. However, in the situation I described I don't now why they would be required to give notice. Maybe I've forgotten that part, but I don't think schools are required to give notice. That's one of the biggest problems with that latest ruling. Cities cannot post, generally, and schools don't need to and probably don't know much about the law that requires other businesses to post. It's a mess.

Schools don't have to give notice in the school, If they are using a city park for an athletic event then they should give notice of the event. An LTC holder who is responsible would know that they cannot carry there.
PC 46.05 states "(2) on the premises where a high school, collegiate, or professional sporting event or interscholastic event is taking place, unless the license holder is a participant in the event and a handgun is used in the event."
INAL but I do not believe the whole park would be off limits because a field in one part of the park is being used for an interscholastic event. If the field is used for public use also then that is where notice that the event is taking place. I see a defense of prosecution if the LTC holder was unaware and no effort to make them aware of what was going on. Again INAL

C-dub wrote:Due to recent court rulings, the only time this might be dicey is if there is a school sporting event going on there. Some schools don't have their own athletic fields and have agreements to use the city parks fields for games.

In those instances, notice should be given.