TexasCHLforum.com

No kidding....
No argument was meant to erupt from this thread Young. You expressed you're opninion and I expressed mine. No one is "cooler" for carrying a firearm with no secondary safety and I don't appreciate the sarcasm surrounding my safety habits; it's a personal choice I have made. Didn't mean to step on your toes and I don't feel as though I was being argumentative. I was just responding to your post.

Geez....have we gotten away from the subject at hand or what?!?!

I am all for safety and pride myself in that fact. My wife appreciates it as well. Txi....you summed up my entire point when you stated that they are an inaniment object that require an outside force to cause them to react the way that a firearm operates. I agree that people can do stupid things, but I would never call well maintained firearm unsafe based soley upon personal opinion. Thanks for the insight Txi. Your opinion is respected as always.

So then you believe that they are unsafe, Txi? Or that the safety of a firearm soley depends on the discipline and catiousness of the carrier? That was the point of my post.

TheYoungGuy wrote:As for the above mentioned "safety issue", I assure you that issue is why I DON'T carry a Glock. I think they are unsafe.

?????
Glocks are unsafe?!?
One of the safest pistols on the market shows the research from Guns and Ammo Magazine. The internal mechanism is completely disabled until your finger is ON the trigger. And it has been mentioned SEVERAL times before in this forum: "Guns do not discharge on their own". Glock lovers back me up a little here and throw in your thoughts and experiences.

And B.T.W.
Why would your finger be on the trigger anyways unless you had the intention of shooting it?