TexasCHLforum.com

mojo84 wrote:

rbwhatever1 wrote:

jmra wrote:

G.A. Heath wrote:Here I was thinking spam bots were writing the articles, with the headlines like "Texas set to approve open up have of handguns, witnessed as get for gun-rights activists" from this article http://www.bulletinstandard.org/us/texa ... 10153.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; It will be hard to convince me otherwise.

Wow! That was painful.

Very. Incoherent sentences a plenty in that one.

That have big hamburger right gun stuff Christmas in April all over The Grand ole opry State of Tejas right there. Nothing like plumbago pie.

That was hilarious I don't care if you're drinkin or not...

jmra wrote:

G.A. Heath wrote:Here I was thinking spam bots were writing the articles, with the headlines like "Texas set to approve open up have of handguns, witnessed as get for gun-rights activists" from this article http://www.bulletinstandard.org/us/texa ... 10153.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; It will be hard to convince me otherwise.

Wow! That was painful.

Very. Incoherent sentences a plenty in that one.

Say that 3 times really fast. I'm much happier now than I was 10 minutes ago. Awesome Bill!!

jmra wrote:

rbwhatever1 wrote:

jmra wrote:

rbwhatever1 wrote:Not sure I like the fact that some municipalities can preempt the State of Texas. This road should be blocked in its entirety.

What are you referring to?

We were typing at the same time! I edited my post because it confused me too! Unless I'm reading the amendment wrong.

I'm still not sure I'm clear. HB 910 does not allow a local exemption, that amendment was tabled. Are you saying you don't like the idea that the law allowed the amendment to be offered to begin with?

The link shows amendment 9 was adopted. Maybe I'm totally confused, I hope so. I would hate to see potentially 6.5 Million Texans lose this OC option within large cities.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/ ... 910H29.HTM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

jmra wrote:

rbwhatever1 wrote:Not sure I like the fact that some municipalities can preempt the State of Texas. This road should be blocked in its entirety.

What are you referring to?

We were typing at the same time! I edited my post because it confused me too! Unless I'm reading the amendment wrong.

Not sure I like the fact that some municipalities can preempt the State of Texas. This road should be blocked in its entirety.
Edit: Preempt not the correct term...

In regards to the large pops municipalities it appears we just chopped it up:

Sec. 23. RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.

If a sign is not "conspicuously posted" one should be able to enter and leave without issue. I only look at the entrance doors and walls. If it isn't there I'm not obligated to go looking for it behind a stack of boxes or underneath sale sign's somebody may have stuck on top of it. Of course no one will know I'm carrying anyway...