Search found 2 matches

by rbwhatever1
Sat Feb 21, 2015 7:19 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
Replies: 19
Views: 1838

Re: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags

MechAg94 wrote:
rbwhatever1 wrote:Chris Murphy obviously cant count. I'd say the nut was short about 505 rounds.

"Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Thursday touted the bill, which would ban magazines of more than 10 rounds, hours after reports circulated that police had foiled a mass shooting plot aimed at Congress. "Think of the damage that someone could do in the U.S. Capitol with 30 rounds,” he said at a briefing.
In the US Capital I am not sure I would refer to it as "damage". :smilelol5: I guess I shouldn't say that.
Ha! I agree. I was kinda nervous about the 505 round comment but I didn't shout fire in a theater or support any violence towards 535 politicians. I also labeled him a nut. The helicopters haven't landed in my pasture so I'm guessing the Feds didn't have any issues. He is a nut Feds. I know you're reading this...

Happy Saturday Armed Texans! (and Feds)
by rbwhatever1
Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:33 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
Replies: 19
Views: 1838

Re: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags

Chris Murphy obviously cant count. I'd say the nut was short about 505 rounds.

"Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Thursday touted the bill, which would ban magazines of more than 10 rounds, hours after reports circulated that police had foiled a mass shooting plot aimed at Congress. "Think of the damage that someone could do in the U.S. Capitol with 30 rounds,” he said at a briefing.

Return to “Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags”