Search found 2 matches

by Dadtodabone
Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:53 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: UN Arms Treaty
Replies: 16
Views: 952

Re: UN Arms Treaty

Dave2 wrote:
TexasGal wrote:I have read it is Two Thirds of the Senate present not the full 2/3. Let's hope all our Republican senators have good attendance.
That's interesting... If you're right, I can't imagine anyone would think this vote trivia enough to miss.
It is indeed 2/3 of those present, I do agree with DaveSquared though, that the Conservative elements in the Senate will be there and vote Nay.
by Dadtodabone
Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:59 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: UN Arms Treaty
Replies: 16
Views: 952

Re: UN Arms Treaty

The U.S. Senate must consent to any treaty entered into by the Executive. And that consent must be in the form of a 2/3 majority vote before ratification can take place. There isn't a snowballs chance in a furnace, that the ATT would ever clear the Senate. Mr. Obama and Mr. Kerry are playing to a foreign audience they feel is more important and influential than the American people. All the while knowing that Senate consent was a dead letter. This will play out just like Kyoto, a rejected treaty used by the Socialist masquerading as President, and his minions, to hammer his political opponents.

Return to “UN Arms Treaty”