TexasCHLforum.com

anygunanywhere wrote:

VoiceofReason wrote:

RetNavy wrote:my opinion on the legislation is that IF introduced it would be quickly shot down, which business would want to spend the money to make a secure area for a few shoppers, plus, if lockers were installed in a public place, would you feel comfortable unarming in such a place... as i said thats just my opinion

which business would want to spend the money to make a secure area for a few shoppers

Exactly. That is why I believe you would see a lot fewer 30.06 signs. If some very sturdy lockers were mounted in the wall at the entrance under CCTV where you can lock it up and keep the key I would have no problem disarming there.

I am disabled and walking very far hurts. I hate to make three trips to get into a store when one should be sufficient and I should be able under the law to protect myself and my wife.

Method to your madness!

Excellent!

Think about it. If these bidnesses must provide lock boxes then they must slow be held liable for making sure the weapons stay safe. Make them liable. We have discussed the possibility of making these antis liable when they disarm us. Make it hurt.

Anygunanywhere