Charles L. Cotton wrote: The authors never mentioned crime prevention as a motive when they were laying out their respective bills. They didn't even claim to be solving a problem. Rather, they just said "it makes sense." Now that sounds familiar!
Chas.
I have to say I was leaning to the other side a bit but I think this has me going the other way now. I mean if you are a resident of Texas you should have a Texas CHL and to get one from another state to get around that, well, it just strikes me as wrong. But I haven't heard of this being a real issue and why make more laws than we need? If it's a revenue issue then say so and break it down for us, if not then explain the benefit to us. Right now it does sound like solving a problem that isn't there.