TexasCHLforum.com

Thanks for the replies, and Joe, I've been on duty for the past 15hrs. Cut me a bit of slack as I'm drained both mentally and physically.

joe817 wrote:

nightmare69 wrote:

jmra wrote:

rays87turbo wrote:I'm glad they got this passed. It's a shame they had to strip the Dutton-Huffines amendment. It really shouldn't matter, OC should be protected by the 4th like driving, but I suppose someone will have to take a test case to court to prove it now.
https://www.texastribune.org/2015/05/28 ... arry-bill/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The amendment was useless. Do you think someone who doesn't respect the constitution would respect the wording of the amendment?

So police can stop a person and demand them to present their CHL solely on a visible firearm being worn?

Haven't we(the entire forum) had this debate about a bazaillion times in the past 2 weeks. Or 6 months for that matter?

Simple answer? Yes. ONLY if the officer has reason to.

I'm not on this forum all the time and wanted a strait answer. Your answer contradicts itself. My question is, can a LEO stop a person open carrying without probable cause and demand to see their CHL just because they are open carrying?

I knew there was a amendment preventing LEOs from doing that and I didn't know if it passed with the bill.

jmra wrote:

rays87turbo wrote:I'm glad they got this passed. It's a shame they had to strip the Dutton-Huffines amendment. It really shouldn't matter, OC should be protected by the 4th like driving, but I suppose someone will have to take a test case to court to prove it now.
https://www.texastribune.org/2015/05/28 ... arry-bill/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The amendment was useless. Do you think someone who doesn't respect the constitution would respect the wording of the amendment?

So police can stop a person and demand them to present their CHL solely on a visible firearm being worn?