Gun ranges..public and plenty of other people around.TexasCajun wrote:I think the difference is that the chl allows you to carry a gun with you where the others would have you leave the gun secured somewhere.jmra wrote:I don't know it for a fact but my assumption is the only reason that the class and range requirements were included in the bill in the first place was because it was the only way to get it passed. Of course I could be wrong about that.
I often wonder why people who believe we need tougher requirements for CHL classes are not fighting to pass legislation that would require training prior to purchasing a firearm. After all these same untrained people have guns in their homes and their cars without any training requirements. I often wonder why they only became such a danger to themselves and society when they decided to get a CHL but weren't before that.
Just to be clear, I don't support any additional training requirements.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Is The CHL Proficiency Test Sufficient?”
- Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:28 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Is The CHL Proficiency Test Sufficient?
- Replies: 83
- Views: 10267