Search found 3 matches

by 67SS
Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:32 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to see
Replies: 23
Views: 3503

Re: Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to

jr0ck wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:
...Moving past the Holiday Inn, I'd like to point out that anyone promoting the idea of shooting police officers trying to make an arrest is a clear non-starter in my book. The time to discuss whether an arrest was legal or not is in the courtroom, not out there facing a gun muzzle.

I suppose one could theoretically argue about a hypothetical corrupt police squad where the person truly thinks they will be killed or quietly "disappear" before ever making it to jail, but we are still the United States, not the cartel-owned and corrupt Mexico. In the United States, 99.9999999999999% of arrests should be battled in the courtroom.
I kind of wonder what would have happened had the women LAPD shot at unannounced returned fire. They clearly emptied their mags, and must have been exempt from weapons training.

[ Image ]

thats incredible... and incredulous... twice in one day... think these guys were on a mission to be judge and jury? here we have another mental case.. at least 5 of them... the one they are looking for and 4 cops shooting civilians.... looks like unbridled marshal law to me... execution on site... last thought, how does one mistake a 71 year old woman and a 49 year old woman with Hispanic sure names as a large black man? clearly they were shooting at both the passenger side and the drivers side.... there is something fishy about this accidental/mistaken identity shooting...
by 67SS
Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:37 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to see
Replies: 23
Views: 3503

Re: Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to

Dragonfighter wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:<SNIP> I'd like to point out that anyone promoting the idea of shooting police officers trying to make an arrest is a clear non-starter in my book. The time to discuss whether an arrest was legal or not is in the courtroom, not out there facing a gun muzzle.

I suppose one could theoretically argue about a hypothetical corrupt police squad where the person truly thinks they will be killed or quietly "disappear" before ever making it to jail, but we are still the United States, not the cartel-owned and corrupt Mexico. In the United States, 99.9999999999999% of arrests should be battled in the courtroom.
Maybe the time to argue is in the undisclosed location where you are being held without charges and indefinitely.
:smilelol5:
by 67SS
Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:34 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to see
Replies: 23
Views: 3503

Re: Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to

yep 1936 miller.....

a less that 18" shotgun is not ordinary military equipment...


however, had the justice rendering the decision had been fully informed he might have not render that decision with that verbiage....

during WWI short barreled shot guns measuring less that 18" where very common in trench warfare...
so by justices own ignorance and Mr. millers conviction we now have the verbiage that is in our favor..

I tell ya ignorance is sometimes bliss... :hurry:

Return to “Two Supreme Court decisions the antis don't want you to see”