TexasCHLforum.com

Mike1951 wrote:

Gameover wrote:Man what is going on up in here....tuna came in with a BANG!!!

Maybe he has a gun he wants to sell. He's getting there in record time!

RPB wrote:You might have trouble up around TOW Texas on Lake Buchanan where in the Newspaper there's usually photos of 6-year old girls and a deer they shot and 14-year old girls in Marble Falls winning National marksmanship awards

Guns around Kids is as normal as bicycles (which are dangerous).

fickman wrote:I should have said "among the tragedies of Newtown"...

clarionite wrote:

tuna wrote:

clarionite wrote:As far as hostile, if you honestly believe your first post wasn't hostile... I'm not interested in continuing the conversation.

Yeah, I don't see it as hostile... it's an opinion, and I posted it because I wanted debate. If you disagree with what I say, that doesn't make it hostile. I'm sorry if I scared you away.

I'm not scared. Life's just too short to deal with sensless hostility.

clarionite wrote:As far as hostile, if you honestly believe your first post wasn't hostile... I'm not interested in continuing the conversation.

canvasbck wrote:Yes, your being emotional and it is severly clouding your judgement. The good, law abiding folks here are just as passionate about protecting innocent children, including those who have not yet been born, as anyone. We want to see the same level of protection afforded to our children at school that we, as CHL holders, provide to them whenever they are not at school.

fickman wrote:The tragedy of Newtown is that the teachers, administrators, and parents had their rights to be armed infringed in violation of the 2nd Amendment. They were defenseless. Maybe nobody would have chosen to exercise their right. That'd be their choice. Maybe one would have. Maybe they would have stopped the shooter. Maybe they wouldn't have. But, at the moment an assassin's gun pointed their direction, they deserved the dignity to defend themselves if they had so chosen, and they were denied that dignity. End of story..

RPB wrote: Here's a link to the Introduce yourself thread
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=33&p=760320&hilit= ... ce#p760320" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

clarionite wrote:No, Disingenuous attempts to "Keep the children safe" that are actually laws intended to infringe on constitutional rights shouldn't be considered.

Hostile attacks and attempts at emotional baiting as your first post is the reason you have zero credibility.

canvasbck wrote:Why Tuna, are you ignoring me? I see your still online but still not interested in an informed, fact based debate. ...

canvasbck wrote:Alright troll, I'll bite.

Yes, dead kids matter and the 20 children killed at Sandy Hook, although tragic, pales in comparison to those killed by drowning in pools EVERY YEAR, not a one time event, but an ongoing sensless slaughter of children so that we can lounge by the pool.

The president ignored the only idea that was actually aimed at protecting schools......

The ideas that you and your ilk spout forward do nothing ...

Try reading a little and learning some facts, when your ready for an informed, fact based debate, there are scores here ready for that debate.

longhorn_92 wrote:YOU came here to push buttons and to look for a "fight". Have a fantastic day. I am done with you.

Mike1951 wrote:He waited four years because if he had acted in his first term he wouldn't have been re-elected.

Nothing like the security of being the lamest of ducks.

RPB wrote: Who was your CHL instructor .... That's what this forum is for ...
Would you like a recommendation on where o take the class?

RPB wrote:Why make your first post in "political" section?