TexasCHLforum.com

Pb_shutr wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I hope that a lot of OCT/OCTC/CATI folks are watching this debate. If anyone watching thinks that unlicensed open-carry had any chance of passage, then they are unwilling to to fact political reality.

Chas.

Mr. Cotton,
Can you enlighten me what the useful purpose of "licensed" open carry is supposed to achieve? It is my concern that each and every LEO will feel obligated to enforce "licensed" open carry by approaching every open carry individual to check that person's compliance with said law and asking for proof of approval to open carry. Why would I subject myself to this forced interaction by each LEO, maybe even several times just on one particular outing. In addition, I think these LEO's are going to on very heightened alert. At this time I can carry concealed standing shoulder to should with an LEO and he/she never knows I'm carrying and has no concern with me. Now, I do understand if I encounter a bad guy and need my firearm, I do have to draw from concealment.
Thanks,
Mike

74novaman wrote:So based on the testimony today, it's likely campus carry will go the same way, but open carry won't be allowed on a college campus.

Is that the compromise this year to get these two bills passed?

Salty1 wrote:I have been thinking about the "rights to privacy" certain things we do in life seem to give up that right by our own actions. My thoughts is that this would fall into the same category so if one is that concerned about others knowing that they have a CHL there is a clear alternative...... do not open carry.