I watch pretty much all of Taofledermaus' videos, pretty entertaining stuff.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 12:43 pmThe guy from the YouTube channel Toflaefermous (sp?) is a cop in central California and said that plenty of people in his area have non California compliant ARs, and they’re not worried about having them.K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:13 amAs much as some folks want that done, the Feds don't have the resources to accomplish that (though I know you already know that). Heck, the State of California can't even track down all the people with "illegal assault weapons", and many of the rural counties in that state just don't care unless one of those is used in a crime. Thus the ownership of an "illegal assault weapon" in one of those rural counties there becomes a tack-on charge. I'd imagine the same would apply for bump stocks, though the use of a bump stock would be a bit more obvious, and the user would run the risk of someone ratting him or her out to the authorities.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:24 pmGranted. But I have to wonder how many were actually turned in/destroyed. I don’t have one. Never did, as I personally see no use for them other than for entertainment purposes. (I’m not that easily entertained.) That said, they were not a registered item. EVEN IF law enforcement decided to track down credit card receipts from those vendors that sold them online, there’s no way to prove that a bumpstock buyer still has his bumpstock.srothstein wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:39 pmYes, they became illegal to own, so the ruling said it must be destroyed or turned in to the police for destruction.
"Where’s your bumpstock?"
"I destroyed it, like I was told to."
"Show us the pieces."
"Are you kidding me? I cut it up into pieces and burned it on March 24, 2019, two days before the deadline! There’s LITERALLY no pieces left! Have a nice day, Mein Herr."
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Bump stock ruling vacated, to be reheard”
- Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:55 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Bump stock ruling vacated, to be reheard
- Replies: 26
- Views: 12184
Re: Bump stock ruling vacated, to be reheard
- Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:13 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Bump stock ruling vacated, to be reheard
- Replies: 26
- Views: 12184
Re: Bump stock ruling vacated, to be reheard
As much as some folks want that done, the Feds don't have the resources to accomplish that (though I know you already know that). Heck, the State of California can't even track down all the people with "illegal assault weapons", and many of the rural counties in that state just don't care unless one of those is used in a crime. Thus the ownership of an "illegal assault weapon" in one of those rural counties there becomes a tack-on charge. I'd imagine the same would apply for bump stocks, though the use of a bump stock would be a bit more obvious, and the user would run the risk of someone ratting him or her out to the authorities.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:24 pmGranted. But I have to wonder how many were actually turned in/destroyed. I don’t have one. Never did, as I personally see no use for them other than for entertainment purposes. (I’m not that easily entertained.) That said, they were not a registered item. EVEN IF law enforcement decided to track down credit card receipts from those vendors that sold them online, there’s no way to prove that a bumpstock buyer still has his bumpstock.srothstein wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:39 pmYes, they became illegal to own, so the ruling said it must be destroyed or turned in to the police for destruction.
"Where’s your bumpstock?"
"I destroyed it, like I was told to."
"Show us the pieces."
"Are you kidding me? I cut it up into pieces and burned it on March 24, 2019, two days before the deadline! There’s LITERALLY no pieces left! Have a nice day, Mein Herr."