TexasCHLforum.com

apostate wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 8:02 pm Sorry your girl lost.

Not my girl, must be yours. I don't vote for Democrats. YOU seem to be the one who hates President Trump. I voted for Ted Cruz in the primary, and Trump in the general because THAT WAS THE SANE CHOICE. YOU seem to hate him so much over the bumpstock thing that you want him to lose next year.

apostate wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 5:30 pm

K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 3:08 pm I just LOVE all the folks on here who are going to do their best to help Joe "Two Blasts In the Air" Biden become president next year.

When did DJT post on this forum?

Go ahead then, get a Democrat as POTUS, might as well make it Bernie if you're going to go that route, full hog hammer-and-sickle communism. Maybe the Democrat will give everyone their bumpstocks back...after they raise your taxes through the roof, start selling out our troops again, run around the world apologizing for our nation, and give the last remnants of everything away to China. Look, I don't love Trump by any means, I just know he's a lot better than Hillary by a long, long mile, bumpstocks or no bumpstocks.

I just LOVE all the folks on here who are going to do their best to help Joe "Two Blasts In the Air" Biden become president next year...because that'll make it all SO much better.

Liberty wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:07 am

Grumpy1993 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2019 11:42 am

Ms. Harris said that, if elected, she would sign an executive order mandating background checks for customers of any firearms dealer who sells more than five guns a year. The executive actions would also include more strident regulation of gun manufacturers that could result in revoked licenses or prosecution, as well as an attempt to close the loophole that allows some domestic abusers to purchase guns if their victim is an unwedded partner.

I know some people have a knee jerk reaction to anything proposed by Democrats but they're better ideas than banning bump stocks.

1. It seems reasonable to categorize somebody selling more than five guns a year as a gun dealer. Texas requires a car dealer license if you sell five or more cars in a year.

2. I have no problem with ATF enforcing current laws on manufacturers and revoking licenses for significant violations. I would hope this happens already but maybe it's more work than online sting operations for freeze plugs and solvent traps.

3. I'm not sure what she's talking about here. Somebody can be convicted of domestic violence if they're not married to their victim. If somebody has a DV conviction, they're already disqualified unless they're a protected class, and I have no problem with eliminating that loophole.

She also mentioned banning High Capacity Magazines.
1: I always thought that the unlicensed volume dealer was unfair competition to Local Gun Shops. But families should be able to dispose of their weapons without lots of hinderance and red tape. Dealers are notorious for low balled prices.
2: I think she is also talking about prison time for clerical errors.
3: Domestic Violence charges is one of the most abused charges there is. Often the violence is just name calling, imagined or just trumped up, A lifetime ban of a basic civil right, on what is often just a misdemeanor charge is pretty harsh.

The problem with socialists if they scream their idiocracy out long and loud enough, it can sound pretty mainsteam.

Regarding the red-highlighted item only, I do believe that is at least one of the reasons no number has been placed on how many firearms can be sold and still not be considered "in the business of". Many estate sales include private sales of firearms collections. It is pretty much a one-time thing, even though it may include a sizeable number of firearms. People should NOT be forced to sell those firearms through a dealer, it is private property, and as long as the firearms aren't knowingly being sold to prohibited persons, then that it all that matters.

Regarding the blue-highlighted item only, wasn't that one of the excesses of the GCA of 1968 (bad law), which were supposed to be reeled in by the FOPA of 1986 (overall good law), but were still ignored by the Clintonian regime to shut down FLLs? I'm pretty sure it was...and we don't need to go back to that garbage.