I'm with RoyGBiv on this one. Unless they put up proper notice for whatever state laws require (30.06 in Texas, gunbusters in some places, etc.) then as far as I am concerned "concealed means concealed". I'm not saying I like the Starbucks CEO or his politics...I am saying that he has a widely varying customer base, of which OC types are a minority of people. He cannot literally afford to tick off a large portion of the people that frequent his establishments and keep the money flowing. The bottom line comes first. That is simply business. If he LOSES money due to this decision, then it will be felt in the corporate wallet and maybe he will figure that out. All of the folks on here and in the wider world have the choice of buying Starbucks coffee or not. Coffee can be gotten at many places. Choose the one that is right for you, as your conscience dictates.RoyGBiv wrote:Paraphrasing: "I don't want guns, but I'm not banning them. Please do not bring guns to Starbucks, but they are not banned."
A statement calculated to tell folks to stop using his business to make a point about guns.
Oral notice sufficient for 30.06? No. "not banned".
Search found 1 match
Return to “Starbucks folds to antis”
- Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:35 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks folds to antis
- Replies: 171
- Views: 29881