TexasCHLforum.com

Pawpaw wrote:

rotor wrote:

Pawpaw wrote:

rotor wrote:This story does not bode well for that synagogue.

http://jhvonline.com/accidental-weapon- ... 245-90.htm

That story is over 8 years old.

Same Rabbi, same synagogue, negligent discharge, people hurt, does it matter if it was 8 years ago or yesterday? I doubt if the Rabbi moderator will be of an open mind. Also says they have a no gun policy but I don't know if they are properly posted. Did not see them on 30.06.com.

How does an 8 year old event "does not bode well for that synagogue" today?

Are you seriously asking me this? Do you think that it matters that it was 8 years ago or yesterday? I don't expect that the Rabbi involved will be unbiased after a concealed carrier (LEO) dropped his firearm, had a ND that 2 people were injured with, the person carrying knew that carry was not allowed. I don't expect that the moderator will have forgotten this "incident" and I don't expect that this will be anything more than a rant about gun violence. Perhaps I am wrong and perhaps this will be "fair and balanced". Perhaps I will be selling my ownership in a bridge in Brooklyn too. Perhaps falling firearms never discharge too.

Pawpaw wrote:

rotor wrote:This story does not bode well for that synagogue.

http://jhvonline.com/accidental-weapon- ... 245-90.htm

That story is over 8 years old.

Same Rabbi, same synagogue, negligent discharge, people hurt, does it matter if it was 8 years ago or yesterday? I doubt if the Rabbi moderator will be of an open mind. Also says they have a no gun policy but I don't know if they are properly posted. Did not see them on 30.06.com.

This story does not bode well for that synagogue.

http://jhvonline.com/accidental-weapon- ... 245-90.htm