TexasCHLforum.com

I feel it, I feel it!!!!

I guess I am just looking at this the wrong way. I have NO ISSUES with the way this one turned out. My problem is in a general sense that one group can have enough money to change an election based on one single issue.

Would we all be happy and celebrating the political system with the Action Against Arms was able to raise the support (let's face it, through money) and was able to unseat all 2A candidates and put in anti?
How about all the Atheist billboards that go up supporting a certain politician?

Get rid of all PACs, even if they are ones that I have donated to and support. I support the ILA because they are there to offset the PACs that I do not agree with.

Should one PAC have that much power to swing the vote? I don't know if this was the only reason for such a large swing but probably had much to do with it. What happens when, not if, the Anti groups have a PAC as strong as the NRA-ILA and can do the same thing against us? This is why our politicians do what the money wants and not what is best for the group that elected them to office.