Read section (D) (2)RPBrown wrote:They may have signs up but according to this, https://www.municode.com/Api/CD/Ordinances/15302/671048" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; .CoffeeNut wrote:That's not what I read for Austin and San Antonio had signs up saying get a hands free device.RPBrown wrote:I have hands free earphones of which I keep one in my ear so I can hear surrounding noises. However, after reading the ordinance, it appears that even talking on a hands free device can draw a fine.
Read section (A) (2).
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.”
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:22 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14622
Re: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:36 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14622
Re: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
That's not what I read for Austin and San Antonio had signs up saying get a hands free device.RPBrown wrote:I have hands free earphones of which I keep one in my ear so I can hear surrounding noises. However, after reading the ordinance, it appears that even talking on a hands free device can draw a fine.
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:32 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14622
Re: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
If the gun were to move then both the officer and her would have a pretty bad day with a bad outcome. People act werid during traffic stops and sometimes a common sense reminder goes a long way. Tone is something we lack here and that can take it from a reminder to "insulting" but from what I've read it was all good.txcharvel wrote:I have not had an encounter with law enforcement in years and never with my CHL. I know they mean no harm and are probably trying to be light hearted about it, but I find comments like this really insulting. Is it just me?Frankie wrote: " as long as it stays there, we'll both be happy"
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:11 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14622
Re: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
Another option would be a newer phone as most now come standard with a "hands free mode". It'll read out your calls and texts much like the car will but can redirect to your Bluetooth so only you can hear it.The Annoyed Man wrote:I am currently researching new vehicles, and the ability for hands-free phone use is one of the features I'm going to be pretty insistent on. It's not that I use my phone a lot while driving, but I do occasionally use it, particularly to answer calls from clients.....who have no idea that I'm driving when they call......so I would like as much as possible to be able to do so without violating some city's ordinance of which I am unaware.A-R wrote:The text of Austin's new ordinance. Basically, as it's been explained to me, if you're touching the device with your fingers (even if it's mounted and you're not holding it), then you're in violation.
https://www.municode.com/Api/CD/Ordinances/15302/671048" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The in car feature is nice but you have to Bluetooth sync your phone anyway. Although a newer car would be nice as I'm still in one with a cassette player
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 9:59 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14622
Re: Wife's contact with San Antonio PD.
San Antonio is on the ball with enforcing the new city ordinance as I know quite a few people who have been busted for texting/talking while driving. If you need to use your phone you're allowed to use a hands-free bluetooth device but if you're fooling around with the phone you're in trouble.