So, is the data really in now? Should we end the isolation? Lets take a look at some of the data and see what we think.
Texas has 21,944 confirmed cases. That is a lot of sick people. Some of them were so sick that they passed away. Texas has had 561 fatalities blamed on COVID-19. An interesting note on this is that Texas has had 225,078 people tested for the virus. That means that less than 10% of the people who were tested for the virus actually had it. Considering this has been pretty much the going rate since the DSHS started posting the data it is an interesting problem. When it started, you only tested people to confirm they had the virus when they had known exposure or showed specific symptoms. There are two possible conclusions from this - one is that the test is faulty and the other is that the disease is not nearly as widespread as was first though.
In more than one study now (Stanford did one in Santa Clara County and LA did one in LA County, while NY just did one across NY state), the test has shown that the disease is much more widespread than we first thought. This is based on a test for antibodies than can only be developed in the body after contracting at least some case of the virus. Stanford said that up to 85 times the number of people who originally were thought to have the virus had the antibodies. An important note is that they only tested people who had not been tested for the virus itself. If we apply that to Texas, we get around 1.85 million cases in Texas. NY state has shown 20% of the people in NYC had the antibodies. Their test is a little more interesting because by testing around the state, they got different percentages in different parts of the state. It ranged from 3.6 to 21% and had a statewide average of 13.9%.
Texas has a population estimate of around 28.5 million. If we actually had a 13.9% infection rate, that means we had 3.9 million cases in Texas. We could also guesstimate that our rate is somewhere between the two counts shown (1.85 and 3.9 million) and say it is about 2.5 million. Or, given that the Stanford study used the 85 times as their high end, we could use it as a point in the middle between their low end and NY's average. I tend to be conservative on things like this, so lets continue to work with the 1.85 million cases as out number.
The Texas fatality rate for 561 fatalities out of 21,944 cases is 2.61%. But since the fatality number did not change, using 1.85 million cases would lower the fatality rate to .003%. That is not a typo, but is 3/100ths of 1 % of the cases. Out of 252 fatality cases investigated so far in Texas, we had 20 people (under 10 %) die that were younger than 50. No one who was younger than 20 dies. 27 people in their 50w (another 10%) died, while 49 in their sixties and another 49 in their 70s passed away. 107 out of the 252 fatalities investigated were in their 80s. I am guessing that the percentage of deaths by age will change slightly, but just slightly, as those remaining cases are investigated and released.
So, using what is now publicly available as data (all data to be taken with a grain of salt since it is media reported and not in peer reviewed journals), what can we conclude. I believe that:
1. The virus is much more contagious than we first thought. It is spread much more easily than anyone believed.
2. It is not nearly as serious as people first led us to believe. Somewhere between 75 and 95% of the people who had the virus experienced either no symptoms or such light symptoms that they never went to a doctor or for testing.
3. People build up their immunization to the virus very easily. This is actually a corollary of statement 2. It is possible that the people with the antibodies never had a real "case" of the virus, just were exposed to it enough for their body to react by building up antibodies. Either way, this means the disease is not nearly as deadly as some people led us to believe.
4. The testing procedures people are using to determine if a person has the virus are worthless. A 90% negative rate makes either the testing worthless or our diagnosis process wrong. Either way, waiting for testing capability is a waste of time.
5. If my logic in the first four statements is correct (and I am not a medical expert and freely admit I could be wrong on any or all of it), then it does say the lockdown was unnecessary and ruined our economy from fear instead of actual need. We need to reopen all business and just use some simple common sense guidelines to protect the most vulnerable people. The most vulnerable are the elderly. The DSHS case information does not reveal commodities, but all of the news has been saying another highly vulnerable group are those with other medical conditions already. It seems reasonable to me that those with other serous illnesses or conditions and the elderly are more likely to die from this disease. It is a little cold-hearted to point out but they are also the ones more likely to die anyway.
Yes, I am ready to see almost all businesses reopen with no restrictions. I think the businesses could self-police and decide how long they want to require customers to wear masks or pay for extra cleaning and disinfecting of their business. I am a big believer in the market controlling things and I don't think most people would accept a store not being clean a little more than it was before. The one type of business I want to see still a little more closely regulated is the food processing industry. I cannot see how clean they maintain the equipment or building directly and with the number of cases coming out of some of the processing plants, I have a little concern. I have faith that the big name companies, like Tyson chicken, would prepare and clean the buildings. But I never heard of the company whose pork processing was shutdown for their employees getting COVID-19. So, I would accept the state concentrating on making sure places like those (including Tyson) are kept clean to ensure our food supply is as safe as we can make it (note I did not say safe, just as safe as we can make it - nothing is truly safe).
Search found 2 matches
Return to “The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation”
- Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:23 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4073
- Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:04 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4073
Re: The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation
Makes sense to me