This was what I said. Checkpoints in general are not constitutional but properly conducted ones are. i even listed some of the conditions making it properly conducted, such as the state law defining how it would operate.E.Marquez wrote:I beg to differ.srothstein wrote:Minor technical correction, but it may help with this discussion. SCOTUS did not rule that DWI checkpoints do not violate the Constitution. In fact, they ruled just the opposite.E.Marquez wrote:the SCOTUS has opined, DUI check points DO NOT violate constitutional rights.
6-3 decision in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz (1990), the United States Supreme Court found properly conducted sobriety checkpoints to be constitutional.
The articles use shorthand like saying the court upheld DWI checkpoints when the court really upheld the specific example being questioned and not the generality of checkpoints, even DWI checkpoints.