As an earlier poster said, now the employer will just find some other reason to terminate you ( the real reason being the firearm, but that would not be the 'stated' reason ). Being a right to work state, would an employer even have to give a reason ?
I'm not feeling real proteceted here.
Tuckerdog1
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Status of Campus Carry and Parking Lot (in layman's terms)”
- Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:26 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Status of Campus Carry and Parking Lot (in layman's terms)
- Replies: 96
- Views: 45734
- Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:56 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Status of Campus Carry and Parking Lot (in layman's terms)
- Replies: 96
- Views: 45734
Re: Status of Campus Carry and Parking Lot (in layman's term
I understand that Perry has 10 days to sign or veto the bill otherwise it automatically becomes law
Above was posted 5/31. So is the parking lot bill a done deal? Carved in stone? On 9/1 I can't get fired for having a firearm in my locked car at work?
I'd have thought the media would have mentioned it, but I didn't hear a peep.
Thanks,
Tuckerdog1