Point of order...CHL/LEO wrote:Speaking only for myself, if I answered this call no one would get arrested. I would tell the CHL holder that at the legal request of the owner/manager he can't come there anymore and that would be it. If the complainant pushed it the most they could do is ask for a Criminal Trespass warning to be given to the CHL holder. All that means is that if they come back again after being warned they are subject to arrest.
If a person is given a "Criminal Trespass" warning, because of their infraction of carrying a gun in a facility covered by a notice given under 30.06, and they comply...
Does the warning still stand if they return to the same facility at a later date and time, yet are not carrying and violating sufficient notice under 30.06???
My point being that the tresspass warning was issued because the CHL violated the 30.06, yet if they return to the same place without having the firearm on them is that still a violation of that order or warning???
I'm just trying to hypothisize, if that I have been issued a warning, and I leave, but I return to this public place unarmed, which was the case for the warning, and I return unarmed, is that really busting the condition of that warning...
See what I mean??? Technically, I admit I may be violating this warning, but conditionally, I would think I would not, since I am unarmed upon my return...