Never mind my deluded syntax...
Search found 5 matches
Return to “HB595 One-gun-per-month & waiting periods for handguns”
- Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:06 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB595 One-gun-per-month & waiting periods for handguns
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4178
- Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:48 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB595 One-gun-per-month & waiting periods for handguns
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4178
Call me crazy, but I would keep the letters on these bills separate..."Laundry lists" tend to wind up in that "other" pile of letters...Skipper5 wrote:Thanks again....actually we might want to reference another bill HB 594 & HB 595 that cover all the issues in your letter. One covers gun show sales and the other bill proposal covers the 30 day rule.S&W6946 wrote:Thanks for the good words guys. You are welcome to use it. I'd suggest making some changes to my wordings if you can so it wouldn't look too much like a "form" letter.
Again Thanks!!
//John
And one other letter towards the end of the regular session expressing gratitude for their attention to "all" of your previous coorespondence sends a good vibe that is appreciated...
- Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:09 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB595 One-gun-per-month & waiting periods for handguns
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4178
- Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:45 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB595 One-gun-per-month & waiting periods for handguns
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4178
This says a lot about the sponsor of this bill...But then again I am not surprised...
http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_ ... d=BS023575
http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_ ... d=BS023575
- Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:37 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB595 One-gun-per-month & waiting periods for handguns
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4178
"(2) provide to the department any other information requested by the department."
Define "any other information"...
I see this one section without any obvious context or need to be written in here, other than it being a "loophole" for intrusive, non-applicable investigation...
This is one of those bills that needs to find a circular filing container in a very public way...
I am also not impressed with the provisions in "section 220" at all...
That would essentially kill any public discussion or debate on anything you wish to be interested in talking about...I've heard about this thing recently, and am wondering if this is one of those issues that will find favorable passage in the current political climate in D.C. this session???
You could probably say bye bye to websites like this real quick...
Define "any other information"...
I see this one section without any obvious context or need to be written in here, other than it being a "loophole" for intrusive, non-applicable investigation...
This is one of those bills that needs to find a circular filing container in a very public way...
I am also not impressed with the provisions in "section 220" at all...
That would essentially kill any public discussion or debate on anything you wish to be interested in talking about...I've heard about this thing recently, and am wondering if this is one of those issues that will find favorable passage in the current political climate in D.C. this session???
You could probably say bye bye to websites like this real quick...