TexasCHLforum.com

Well, I look at it this way...She is a Fabian Socialist...(look that up if you're not sure what that is)

She is similar to Benard Shaw (author), in that she, and those like her believe that sustained life is only valid if you are valuable to the collective...If you are not, they would prefer a system/mechanism where you, if it is determined by a "board" that you are not living up to their expectations you WILL be terminated...

So, it is obvious that she is not for the means, for anyone choosing to live free from tyrranical devices, as these people represent, to the right to keep and bear arms...

Therefore, if it ever comes to a point where we are definitively challenged on that issue, I suppose she would be amoung those who would bear the brunt of our protest...

Personally, I believe it really is a shame that there are people living amoung us who believe "we" are somehow, unfair, and hateful people to desire to be armed, and that they would do what they could to change that fact...

She deserves pity, more than scorn or action against, in my opinion...But what makes her dangerous is that she does wielda lot of influence (even now after her dissmissal from the WH press corp) in what is left of the state-run liberal main stream media...

We should never assume, nor should we lower our guard...