Yep...txinvestigator wrote:Unless you can cite me a case where that was effective in court, I don't believe it. I have heard this bull for too many years.Rabbi wrote:I could not cite case law for CHL classes, but it has been a common practice for Lawyers to use arguments based on the scores of police officers involved in shootings. Even some Police Dept. have gone to a strict Pass/Fail systemdws1117 wrote:Please forgive my ignorance, but what liability could come from the student keeping thier test target?They dont get to keep the targets and they are destroyed.
"WEll Officer, it says you scored a perfect on your last Quals"
"I guess"
"That makes you some kind of marksmen Top 5% of all shooters in you Dept"
"Well, I shoot OK"
"So, why didnt you shoot the gun out of his hand instead of killing him...."
It has happened before.
If you are justified in using in Deadly Force, how good a shot you are will not nullify that justification. It is also well documented that shooting is much less accurate in actual Deadly Force encounters than standing static on a range. WELL DOCUMENTED.
If students want their scores I gladly tell them. If they want their targets I gladly allow them to take them.
There is no real need to do otherwise. If you perceive a need, then thats OK for you.
Search found 2 matches
- Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:40 pm
- Forum: Instructors' Corner
- Topic: Pass/Fail
- Replies: 47
- Views: 16033
- Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:35 pm
- Forum: Instructors' Corner
- Topic: Pass/Fail
- Replies: 47
- Views: 16033
I believe it has been thought that an aggresive prosecutor could imply that your proficiency and accuracy could indicate your desire/intent to "kill" someone instead of "stop" someone...
Make sure (and I hope no one I know ever has to go through this) your defense counsel understands implicitely that tactic, and is prepared to counter it...
Make sure (and I hope no one I know ever has to go through this) your defense counsel understands implicitely that tactic, and is prepared to counter it...