Search found 2 matches

by stevie_d_64
Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:40 pm
Forum: Instructors' Corner
Topic: Pass/Fail
Replies: 47
Views: 16033

txinvestigator wrote:
Rabbi wrote:
dws1117 wrote:
They dont get to keep the targets and they are destroyed.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what liability could come from the student keeping thier test target?
I could not cite case law for CHL classes, but it has been a common practice for Lawyers to use arguments based on the scores of police officers involved in shootings. Even some Police Dept. have gone to a strict Pass/Fail system

"WEll Officer, it says you scored a perfect on your last Quals"

"I guess"

"That makes you some kind of marksmen Top 5% of all shooters in you Dept"

"Well, I shoot OK"

"So, why didnt you shoot the gun out of his hand instead of killing him...."

It has happened before.
Unless you can cite me a case where that was effective in court, I don't believe it. I have heard this bull for too many years.

If you are justified in using in Deadly Force, how good a shot you are will not nullify that justification. It is also well documented that shooting is much less accurate in actual Deadly Force encounters than standing static on a range. WELL DOCUMENTED.

If students want their scores I gladly tell them. If they want their targets I gladly allow them to take them.

There is no real need to do otherwise. If you perceive a need, then thats OK for you.
Yep...
by stevie_d_64
Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:35 pm
Forum: Instructors' Corner
Topic: Pass/Fail
Replies: 47
Views: 16033

I believe it has been thought that an aggresive prosecutor could imply that your proficiency and accuracy could indicate your desire/intent to "kill" someone instead of "stop" someone...

Make sure (and I hope no one I know ever has to go through this) your defense counsel understands implicitely that tactic, and is prepared to counter it...

Return to “Pass/Fail”