Paladin wrote:KBCraig,
I really like that comment from the other forum:
"If Officer Hurtt has nothing to hide the first camera can go in his house."
Yep... before any other cameras go in, he needs to put up or keep quiet. Since he says their's no expectation of privacy anymore, maybe we could get a live web feed of the inside of his house? After all, if he's not doing anything wrong, why should he worry about it? Next, we need to tape his every move at work. He's a public offical right? What has he got to hide?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know...
I was sitting down trying to have a nice quiet cup of coffee in my kitchen, and I had this itch I had to scratch...
uhhhh, did they get that on camera???
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I bet this brainstorm gets shelved very quickly if we could gather a few of us to go to Tuesday's counsel meeting on a Tuesday, very soon from now...
I could type up a 3 minute talk real fast...One person going up there will sound like a goof...2-3 more sound like a conspiracy...4 or more taking up 3 minute slots gets their attention...
If we're serious about taking them to task for this looney idea, why not commit to staying ahead of it before they start spending money on it...Before they start thinking "Well, we have already begun to lay track on this Metro train system..."
Remember that bull???
And this???
Well, the Dubai company already bought the English company which is the one buying the operation rights to our U.S. ports...
Remember, its really critical to get them before they start to spend money...
And all it takes from a few is an afternoon down at city hall...
Think about it...