TexasCHLforum.com

Limbaugh and Gingrich softened their stances considerably today against Sotomayor, almost like they were threatened by the KGB simultaneously.

The danger inherent in this judicial view is that the law isn't what the Constitution says but whatever the judge in the "richness" of her experience comes to believe it should be.

That pretty good, pdubyoo. But, perhaps some comas might change the meaning of your statement, like some have suggested the Second Amendment was affected.

To wit: "The danger inherent in this judicial view is that the law isn't what the Constitution says, but whatever the judge, in the richness of her experience, comes to believe it should be."

Well, it appears not a thing has been changed by the insertion of all those commas. It still indicates Sotomayor's personal life will influence her decisions. But since approximately sixty per cent of Americans are functionally illiterate, the presence or absence of commas is largely immaterial anyway to a whole lot of folks out there who just don't get it about Sotomayor.

"You can't whistle Dixie out of both sides of your mouth and stay in tune very long."--Unknown

Vaclept on the issue of gun rights she may be, but Sotomayor is not bound by Heller until incorporation of the Second Amendment is confirmed by the Second Circuit or SCOTUS. Of course, common sense would tell a wise man who has lived the life different...