TexasCHLforum.com

Grayling813 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:15 pm

chasfm11 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 11:30 am

Beiruty wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 10:08 am [
Renewable energy is not the solution. Next generation Nuclear fusion energy is. The race is on.

So here is a question: what is going to change to allow nuclear energy in any scale? Let's remember that those behind all of the Green Energy are the same ones who thought that the CFL was so great an idea that it had to be crammed down the throats of the entire country. I don't see any rational thinking in any of this and do not believe the purpose of any of it is to actually do what they are saying that they want.

We could have had current technology nuclear energy on the same scale as France and saved billions of barrels of oil and yet it wasn't allowed. The "three mile island" argument has been weak in the knees since they started it. I don't see this as any different than the gun culture versus the anti-gunners argument. We have solid evidence that concealed carry license holders are not a threat to society and yet the anti-gunners cling to "the existence of guns is a threat." How is that any different that the overwhelming evidence of the U.S. Navy use of nuclear energy for a very long time versus the cry "nuclear energy is a threat." Fusion/fission isn't a discussion if the premise of nuclear never is allowed.

Yeah, the same idiots who blocked nuclear power plants from becoming common and replacing coal/oil electric generation are still steering the ship full speed ahead into iceberg seas with no lookouts.