I prefer Sports Clips. They have TVs...Beiruty wrote:Gun Magazines are protected under the First Amendment. Take that Dianne Fienstien.
Clips are also protected by our nice hair dresser's first natural law. It is so exciting that wherever you go, there is a "Great Clips" place for your looks.
Search found 2 matches
Return to ““HIGH CAPACITY” MAG BAN COULD BE AN ALMOST TOTAL MAG BAN”
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:02 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: “HIGH CAPACITY” MAG BAN COULD BE AN ALMOST TOTAL MAG BAN
- Replies: 10
- Views: 712
Re: “HIGH CAPACITY” MAG BAN COULD BE AN ALMOST TOTAL MAG BAN
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:09 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: “HIGH CAPACITY” MAG BAN COULD BE AN ALMOST TOTAL MAG BAN
- Replies: 10
- Views: 712
Re: “HIGH CAPACITY” MAG BAN COULD BE AN ALMOST TOTAL MAG BAN
That would be the ant's new trick for 2013. During the previous dark era, they realized that magazines don't take much of a beating & they're usually pretty well made. So the rate at which they would have to be replaced due to wear & tear was grossly underestimated. So now they're including the conversion provision to get the standard capacity mags out of circulation sooner.