Emailing, calling, faxing, etc simply records a mark for or against an issue. It's part of a larger picture that they use to construct their position. The boilerplate response is basically so you know they got it. If you want a better idea of where they stand, check out their Facebook and/or twitter page. But whatever you do, don't stop contacting them! They need to see that this issue will not go away until it's definitively settled.mojo84 wrote:I think their staffer marks whether the incoming correspondence was for or against an issue and then fires off the boilerplate response they have set up in their system. I can't really blame them. I don't see how they could personally respond to each contact with a personal letter, call or email.
I used the boilerplate representative contact systems provided by NRA and Ruger. I sure don't want my representatives to dismiss my correspondence because I used a system with boilerplate correspondence even though I did customize the email to the subject and sent the same email to all my reps. Therefore, I won't dismiss their response because it's a form letter.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Response from John Cornyn”
- Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:32 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Response from John Cornyn
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1209