^^^ This applies to the discussion.RPB wrote:Disagree due to context of this topic doesn't concern union membership:Reds45ACP wrote:Texas is, in fact, a Right to Work state. You cannot be forced to join a union to hold a job. Not really sure what that has to do with anything mentioned here.RPB wrote: 1)
You could still be fired ... for any reason at all, or no reason at all; Texas is not a "right to work State" so if you are "caught carrying" they might fire you because they do not like your shoes that day ... or because they'd prefer you part your hair on the other side, or because it is against "employee policy" or fired "just because" ... no reason, just because. (People are fired "for no reason at all" a lot because they think then they can't be sued as easily for firing them "for the wrong reason")
https://www.oag.state.tx.us/agency/righttowork.shtml
AFAIK, The Office of Atty Genl Opinion calling it a "right to work State" only as far as it concerns Union membership; In other words, you can not be fired for joining a Union, or due to race religion, national origin ... other Federal restrictions
Texas is an “employment-at-will” state.
https://www.google.com/search?q=texas+% ... 16&bih=622" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Texas is an “employment-at-will” state. Generally, employees without a written employment contract can be fired for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
Right to work is specifically for Union related issues. Hence, my confusion. I looks like the intended term was Employment-at-Will which is a different issue all together but does apply to the problem of carrying and getting terminated for that.
The following is off-topic so I apologize and will refrain from further posts that are. However, this is some interesting stuff to learn.
Have a read on the link I posted. Texas is a Right to Work state in the full definition of the term. (i.e. Cannot be forced to pay union dues or join a union to gain or keep employment nor prevent you from joining a union with the threat of non-employment or loss of current employment.) It all relates back to the Taff-Hartly act of 1947. More detail on that here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
End of off topic