Of course he sidestepped the question. Those of his ilk are expert at evading, changing the subject and shouting down public discourse. If things don't go the way they want, they evade and try again from a different angle. They know that if they admit things up front and are honest, many will disagree with their agenda.A-R wrote:http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/ ... urthy-rad/
At a hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee last week, Sen. Lamar Alexander asked Dr. Murthy about public comments on firearms, such as a tweet from before the 2012 president election that said, “Tired of politicians playing politics w/ guns, putting lives at risk b/c they’re scared of NRA. Guns are a health care issue.”
Mr. Alexander, the ranking Republican on the committee, told Dr. Murthy that “Americans have a First Amendment right to advocate the Second Amendment — or any other amendment. And the Second Amendment is not a special interest group, it’s part of our Constitution.”
The Tennessee senator added that, “If your goal is to make guns the bully pulpit of your advocacy in the surgeon general’s office, that would concern me.”
Dr. Murthy sidestepped the questions about his gun-control agenda from committee members throughout the hearing.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Obama nominates anti-gun radical for Surgeon General”
- Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:18 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Obama nominates anti-gun radical for Surgeon General
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1033