We will just have to agree to disagree on this.KBCraig wrote:No, the difference is that you think you're not allowing criminals in your house.Right2Carry wrote:The differance is I don't allow criminals in my house, maybe you do, but I don't.KBCraig wrote:It's a shame that you can't distinguish that your plan has exactly the same effect, whether in a private residence or a public business: keeping out the law abiding, while doing nothing to deter criminals.
If you could overcome that, your argument might have merit. You can't, and it doesn't.
Scenario: You meet a repairman at the door, verbally inform him that he's not allowed to carry a concealed handgun, and ask him to sign a declaration to that effect.
Likely result: If he's a CHL, he's probably going to think, "Well, this guy is hinky as all Hades!" He'll head back to his truck, and keep going.
If he's not a CHL, and not a criminal, he'll shrug and think you're some anti-gun nut, and probably continue his job.
If he's an armed criminal, he'll laugh inwardly while signing your paperwork.
Make up your mind.It is not a business and that makes all the differance. Personally I know that the law does not distinguish between business and a private home.
No one has proposed taking that right away from you. You have every right to demand repairmen submit to a metal detector, strip search, and cavity search before entering your home.The fact is I can choose who I allow into my home and who I don't allow, that is my right and neither you or anyone else can take that right away from me.
Good luck with that.
Business owners have wide latitude to discriminate. There are certain protected classes they can't legally discriminate against, but they can legally discriminate against everyone else. No shirt? No service. No shoes? No service. No outside food or drink allowed. Wearing clothing the management considers inappropriate? Hit the road! Carrying a concealed handgun under the authority of Government Code chapter 411? You can't proceed past this PC 30.06 notice.A business owner may not discriminate, but a homeowner can discriminate who he or she allows in thier house without any repurcussions.
I assume everyone I meet, including complete strangers, are armed. You're assuming that your "checklist for repairmen" will magically assure that they're not.YOU may feel comfortable letting a complete stranger in your house with your love ones without knowing how the weapon is secured, what kind of training the individual has, or even if the gun is secured.
You seem to think that you can wave a wand and make your home a "Guns-free zone except for me and mine". The fact that it's your home, instead of a business open to the public, is irrelevant: "gun free" is, and will always be, a fiction.
Kevin
Search found 10 matches
Return to “Thoughts on in home service”
- Sat May 05, 2007 10:00 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
- Fri May 04, 2007 11:35 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
The differance is I don't allow criminals in my house, maybe you do, but I don't. It is not a business and that makes all the differance. Personally I know that the law does not distinguish between business and a private home. The fact is I can choose who I allow into my home and who I don't allow, that is my right and neither you or anyone else can take that right away from me. A business owner may not discriminate, but a homeowner can discriminate who he or she allows in thier house without any repurcussions.KBCraig wrote:It's a shame that you can't distinguish that your plan has exactly the same effect, whether in a private residence or a public business: keeping out the law abiding, while doing nothing to deter criminals.Right2Carry wrote:LOL. It's really a shame that you can't distinguish between a public business and a private residence or your argument might actually have merit.KBCraig wrote:Exactly. It's no different than a 30.06 sign at the mall: keeps out the law abiding, while doing nothing to stop criminals.TxFire wrote:You gonna pat them down too? Those interested in doing harm to you will pay no attention to your little signed form. These people are called CRIMINALS as they disregard the law.
If you could overcome that, your argument might have merit. You can't, and it doesn't.
If they want to leave it in the truck, hey that is fine by me. I don't even care if the telephone, mail carriers, meter readers or whatever carry as long as they don't enter my house with thier weapon.
YOU may feel comfortable letting a complete stranger in your house with your love ones without knowing how the weapon is secured, what kind of training the individual has, or even if the gun is secured. You don't know what kind of shape the weapon is in. Hell he may be bending over, doing a lot of moving around and the weapon may not be held in check by anything more than his underwear. It falls out goes kaboom and a loved one is dead. IF you think EVERY CHL holder is a responsible individual with common sense, then I got some ocean front property to sell you in Arizona.
Again I ask show me data that says repairman or service reps are at high risk being attacked performing repairs or service calls at a homeowners residence. To and from the homeowners house, yes they need to carry. Once getting to my house they need to leave it in the vehicle. It's just my opinion and I don't expect people to agree with it.
- Fri May 04, 2007 8:29 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
LOL. It's really a shame that you can't distinguish between a public business and a private residence or your argument might actually have merit.KBCraig wrote:Exactly. It's no different than a 30.06 sign at the mall: keeps out the law abiding, while doing nothing to stop criminals.TxFire wrote:You gonna pat them down too? Those interested in doing harm to you will pay no attention to your little signed form. These people are called CRIMINALS as they disregard the law.
- Fri May 04, 2007 8:51 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
I understand that, but a verbal notification can be challenged as my word VS thiers, where a written notice with a signature is much harder to dispute.Skiprr wrote:Not to flame any fires here, but Jacob Staff is entirely correct. Take another look at PC 30.06; there is no distinction between a business, a residence, a farm, you name it...only "property of another." Oral notification is fine, but you don't need to work at drafting a written communication; for that to be legal it has to contain the identical language shown in PC 30.06(3).Right2Carry wrote:Actually since it is my home which is not open to the public, I can and will choose who enters my house armed and who doesn't... I am in the works of drafting a written form that will require the repairmans signature stating he is fully aware that he may not enter my house while carrying a gun.Jacob Staff wrote:Right2Carry, you need a 30.06 sign on your house just like business owners that share your ideas of a right to carry except around me
- Thu May 03, 2007 8:20 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
Actually since it is my home which is not open to the public, I can and will choose who enters my house armed and who doesn't. Family and friends who carry are more than welcome, people I do not know shall be forbidden. I don't care if you like it or not, the fact is I control my home. If I had a business I would welcome CHL carriers, but in my HOME I will Choose who enters armed. I don't need to post a sign I will inform you of my right to have the only firearm in the house if and when someone doing repairs shows up at my door.Jacob Staff wrote:This is why I love internet forumsllwatson wrote:You know, you are just digging yourself a deeper hole here...
Ok, so you didn't mean to offend the half dozen or so PC techs that read the forum. What you really meant was the 1000 or so PC USERS that read the forum!![]()
You never can tell when someone is really offended or just poking you with a stick![]()
I used to try to talk my way out these types of misunderstandings. Then I got married and realized you can never win.![]()
Back to the original topic. I vote for pocket carry or http://www.smartcarry.com
and for the 2nd topic,
Right2Carry, you need a 30.06 sign on your house just like business owners that share your ideas of a right to carry except around me
I am in the works of drafting a written form that will require the repairmans signature stating he is fully aware that he may not enter my house while carrying a gun. I WILL ALWAYS RETAIN THE ADVANTAGE WHILE IN MY HOUSE, WITH STRANGERS PRESENT.
I also have to say that those of you who think company ID's with Photo's prove that the person is who he says he is, well I got news for you, those can be faked pretty easily with todays scanners and software.
- Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:21 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
I don't think all companies issue pictured ID's, although it is becoming more the norm. Actually I think that from now on I will ask what the policy of the company is before I decide to give them my business, that way I know up front what to expect. My guess is that 95% of companies prohibit carrying into a home owners house.llwatson wrote:Anyone who wants to come into my house to perform any service is gonna have a company ID, and I am gonna ask to see it.
If you don't have a company issued picture ID, or if you don't look like the picture on your ID badge, then you aren't invited in.
- Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:45 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
All good points, but see here lays the problem. I don't know that he is a CHL holder. He could be a bad man that attacked the real technician and is intent on robbing me or worse. In a private home the situation becomes sticky.txinvestigator wrote:I appreciate your polite honesty.Right2Carry wrote:I don't think it is appropiate because it is my home. It is not a place of business, it is my personal home, my castle. I also believe it creates the potential for a dangerous situation. Truth be known I never really thought much about it until it was brought up in this forum. I believe most businesses will have a company policy against allowing thier technicians to carry while on a service call. There is a huge liability issue for the company in case of an AD or ND.txinvestigator wrote:Of course a 30.06 or verbal notice is required to legally prohibit you from carrying into a customers home. The law is the law, and it is clear.Right2Carry wrote:Being invited to someones home as a friend and going to a house to perform a service are two entirely different things. I am not really sure how the law looks at this, nor am I so sure that a 30.06 posting or a verbal warning is required for someone entering your home as a repairman.phddan wrote:For comfort, the ankle rig would be better, imo, while your laying and rolling on the floor.
Sounds like you need to post the 30.06 sign at your front door, or verbally tell people that they dont have the right to protect themselves in you abode.IMHO carrying into someones home who is a customer is just bad business. I would think most businesses that sent out repair reps ECT... would have a no gun policy in effect for entering a customers home. I don't care about them leaving it in the vehicle, but I don't want someone I don't know entering my home with a loaded gun. I have no idea what kind of training that person has, and a AD in my home from someone performing a service that I am paying for is going to amount to a huge lawsuit on someone.
Family or friends that I know is one thing, a person performing a service is quite another animal all together. I can't imagine a business allowing thier employees to go armed into a private citizens home to perform work. IMHO it is not a good idea.
Dan
I guess some research is in order on this.
I am curious as to WHY you think it is not appropriate for a repairman to carry into a home. Please be specific.
I suspect that most people on this forum if they are being truthful would feel the same if all of a sudden they noticed thier repairman carrying a weapon even if its an inadverdent flash.
With that said I guess for some reason I thought that private residence would be protected with the whole my home is my castle thing. It appears that I was wrong, but am glad that I now know what the law says.
The only firearm bearing person I want in my house is myself, family or good friends. I do not want a total stranger carrying a firearm inside my house.
I have been educated now and will act appropiately in the future to prevent repairman from entering my house while armed.
TXI as I said before, this is just my opinion. If someone chooses a line of work that they know will require them to enter peoples homes, ehy that is thier choice. If they think it is too dangerous find other work.
It appears that the law allows this, I on the other hand think it is wrong. We will just have to agree to disagree on this and move on.
I would have no problem with a CHL holder carrying inside my house. As far as he knows, I am a serial killer and he is my next victim, or a home invader intent on killing all could enter while he is inside, or......., basically all of the same reasons I carry in my home would apply to him while he is in my home.
And by his having a CHL I know he is not a criminal. You don't know that about other repairmen in your home.
Heck, I might even find myself a new shooting buddy.
You being a LEO can rightfully ask to see his CHL ( not sure about how that works in an off duty status) but I as a citizen have no right and no means to make him comply short of calling LEO out.
I am assuming this to be true, since the only person I have to show my CHL to is a LEO.
How would you determine that the tech or repairman coming to your house is indeed a CHL holder and not someone intent on doing your harm?
- Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:43 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
I don't think it is appropiate because it is my home. It is not a place of business, it is my personal home, my castle. I also believe it creates the potential for a dangerous situation. Truth be known I never really thought much about it until it was brought up in this forum. I believe most businesses will have a company policy against allowing thier technicians to carry while on a service call. There is a huge liability issue for the company in case of an AD or ND.txinvestigator wrote:Of course a 30.06 or verbal notice is required to legally prohibit you from carrying into a customers home. The law is the law, and it is clear.Right2Carry wrote:Being invited to someones home as a friend and going to a house to perform a service are two entirely different things. I am not really sure how the law looks at this, nor am I so sure that a 30.06 posting or a verbal warning is required for someone entering your home as a repairman.phddan wrote:For comfort, the ankle rig would be better, imo, while your laying and rolling on the floor.
Sounds like you need to post the 30.06 sign at your front door, or verbally tell people that they dont have the right to protect themselves in you abode.IMHO carrying into someones home who is a customer is just bad business. I would think most businesses that sent out repair reps ECT... would have a no gun policy in effect for entering a customers home. I don't care about them leaving it in the vehicle, but I don't want someone I don't know entering my home with a loaded gun. I have no idea what kind of training that person has, and a AD in my home from someone performing a service that I am paying for is going to amount to a huge lawsuit on someone.
Family or friends that I know is one thing, a person performing a service is quite another animal all together. I can't imagine a business allowing thier employees to go armed into a private citizens home to perform work. IMHO it is not a good idea.
Dan
I guess some research is in order on this.
I am curious as to WHY you think it is not appropriate for a repairman to carry into a home. Please be specific.
I suspect that most people on this forum if they are being truthful would feel the same if all of a sudden they noticed thier repairman carrying a weapon even if its an inadverdent flash.
With that said I guess for some reason I thought that private residence would be protected with the whole my home is my castle thing. It appears that I was wrong, but am glad that I now know what the law says.
The only firearm bearing person I want in my house is myself, family or good friends. I do not want a total stranger carrying a firearm inside my house.
I have been educated now and will act appropiately in the future to prevent repairman from entering my house while armed.
TXI as I said before, this is just my opinion. If someone chooses a line of work that they know will require them to enter peoples homes, ehy that is thier choice. If they think it is too dangerous find other work.
It appears that the law allows this, I on the other hand think it is wrong. We will just have to agree to disagree on this and move on.
- Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:04 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
Being invited to someones home as a friend and going to a house to perform a service are two entirely different things. I am not really sure how the law looks at this, nor am I so sure that a 30.06 posting or a verbal warning is required for someone entering your home as a repairman.phddan wrote:For comfort, the ankle rig would be better, imo, while your laying and rolling on the floor.
Sounds like you need to post the 30.06 sign at your front door, or verbally tell people that they dont have the right to protect themselves in you abode.IMHO carrying into someones home who is a customer is just bad business. I would think most businesses that sent out repair reps ECT... would have a no gun policy in effect for entering a customers home. I don't care about them leaving it in the vehicle, but I don't want someone I don't know entering my home with a loaded gun. I have no idea what kind of training that person has, and a AD in my home from someone performing a service that I am paying for is going to amount to a huge lawsuit on someone.
Family or friends that I know is one thing, a person performing a service is quite another animal all together. I can't imagine a business allowing thier employees to go armed into a private citizens home to perform work. IMHO it is not a good idea.
Dan
I guess some research is in order on this.
- Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:14 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on in home service
- Replies: 77
- Views: 14182
IMHO carrying into someones home who is a customer is just bad business. I would think most businesses that sent out repair reps ECT... would have a no gun policy in effect for entering a customers home. I don't care about them leaving it in the vehicle, but I don't want someone I don't know entering my home with a loaded gun. I have no idea what kind of training that person has, and a AD in my home from someone performing a service that I am paying for is going to amount to a huge lawsuit on someone.
Family or friends that I know is one thing, a person performing a service is quite another animal all together. I can't imagine a business allowing thier employees to go armed into a private citizens home to perform work. IMHO it is not a good idea.
Family or friends that I know is one thing, a person performing a service is quite another animal all together. I can't imagine a business allowing thier employees to go armed into a private citizens home to perform work. IMHO it is not a good idea.