ROFL - I didn't catch that.Zoo wrote:[ Image ]They're only allowed if they're possessed contrary to state law?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06”
- Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:16 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6370
Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06
- Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:49 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6370
Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06
tomtexan wrote:I happened upon this sign today. I just went on through the gate. I had tobacco products too!![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2784/c278431b13209c90e261c8d44c59a4a448f79c1d" alt="Image"
I love how the sign says, "in accordance with state law" like that is some kind of magical phrase that makes it legal and binding on all subjects who dare darken their door step. If you want it to actually BE in accordance with state law, post the sign described in the state law. It seems to me they don't want to be in accordance with state law, so the sign means nothing.
Carry on.
- Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6370
Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06
Legal or not makes all the difference to me.Dirthawking wrote:Okay, I am not asking Legal here.
Let me put it this way. You and your family are on your way out to dinner. You stop at a restaurant and notice they have a 30.06 sign on the door (legal sign or not), do you:
A. Lock your gun up and go inside and enjoy a nice meal with your family
OR
B. Find someplace else to eat that welcomes CHL
If not, I ignore it and go have a nice meal with my family. If it is a legal sign, I find some place else to enjoy a nice meal. Unless there is no other venue that has the accommodations I want, I will not disarm - and restaurants do not generally fall into that category.