Be careful here Charles Cotton. You're officially below the belt now. There is nothing absurd or factually inaccurate with anything I've said. Your choice to focus only on Patrick has seriously limited your position in this discussion. Is he in play here, certainly. Can he do it alone, No. Can he lead, Yes! Is he, I can't tell because one day OC is nearly dead and the next he's trying to walk back his comments. A lot like how you're trying to walk back your comment that open carry advocates just simply want to show off their guns. It was uninformed the first time and frankly your attempt to revise your intent furthers my point. We all want the same thing in that we cherish our 2a rights and want them expanded. This thread is Re: General 2015 Legislative Session Discussion, yet your focus is on one man. Mine is on the entire process. You are right in that Patrick cannot force a bill out of committee but that's not the point. If you actually pay attention to what he is saying and clue in on things like "votes aren't there" "political will" "larger agenda" or "there are more important 2a" then you can glean what he is really saying. He is saying that he likes OC, wishes it would pass, but won't because it would burn too much political capital or that it is too difficult to pass and is going to ensure it doesn't because he's not going to help it. You ask, why Roger do you feel that way? How do you know? Well it is actually really simple Mr. Cotton. As a kid there was a phrase often used to describe those who either tried to hide their appearance or fake it. It was " if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's a duck!" Patrick ran on the GOP ticket and OC. The fact that he said one afternoon OC is nearly dead and then the next he is quoted as saying soemthing entirely different starts to make him look like a duck. Perhaps you should call him up and remind him that he cannot tell the senate to now focus and vote on an Open Carry bill because after all as you have already said " he can't".Charles L. Cotton wrote:I was responding to rogersinsel's absurd statement that the lack of open-carry is an embarrassment to Texas, not suggesting that all open-carry supporters simply want to show their guns.RoyGBiv wrote:This is certainly not why I would like to see OC passed. Not anywhere on my list of reasons.Charles L. Cotton wrote: being able to let everyone see you are armed
Although I would agree that this is a motivation for some.
Chas.
http://www.chron.com/news/politics/texa ... 046739.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;