Spot on...unarmed does not mean un-deadly.Jusme wrote:Replace step dad with a female, replace younger brother with another female. If the shooter was not physically able to stop the attack. Shooting the attacker may have saved a life. Deadly force does not have to involve a weapon. The attacker could have killed the victim with only hands and feet. I don't believe any charges will be forthcoming for the shooter. JMHO
Search found 1 match
Return to “TX: Deadly force in defense of 3rd party against unarmed assailant”
- Fri Sep 02, 2016 6:53 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: TX: Deadly force in defense of 3rd party against unarmed assailant
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7938