Yes, it does, for sure.
However, I have to respect that she presented the amendment in a non-biased matter. She recognized that the bill was contentious, she recognized that there are people on both sides of the matter in the house, and she recognized that the collection of data could allow either side to support their positions with data as the years roll on.
I don't necessarily support the amendment, but I appreciate her way of presenting it in a non-partisan manner.