The difference is back-door gun control. If a background check is required for powder, and one can empty out all ammunition and get all the powder you want, then it stands to reason that we'll need background checks and controlled access to ammo. Boom. Gun control. Common sense measures and all that.alvins wrote:they had a whole shelf of tannerite at academy. whats the difference.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Obviously, we need to control access to powder.”
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:09 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5160
Re: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:23 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5160
Obviously, we need to control access to powder.
Well, well, well, this sure didn't take long.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/34 ... ive-powder" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Senator to Introduce Legislation Requiring Background Checks for Sale of Explosive Powder
“If we are serious about public safety, we must put these common-sense safeguards in place. While the police have not revealed what specific explosive materials were used in Boston, what we do know is that explosive powder is too easy to anonymously purchase across the country.”
We all knew this was coming, it was just a matter of when.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/34 ... ive-powder" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Senator to Introduce Legislation Requiring Background Checks for Sale of Explosive Powder
“If we are serious about public safety, we must put these common-sense safeguards in place. While the police have not revealed what specific explosive materials were used in Boston, what we do know is that explosive powder is too easy to anonymously purchase across the country.”
We all knew this was coming, it was just a matter of when.