TexasCHLforum.com

pistola wrote:

Bladed wrote:

I clicked the link and didnt see them attacking the 30.06 law. I saw them attacking people barracks lawyering what the definition of is is.

In following the link I came away with three things:

1. Not one post conveyed an informed argument.
2. The coalition is comprise of hysterics & ankle biters who harbor a lot of anger.
3. The posters are irrational. They rage against law abiding citizens choosing to defend themselves while ignoring the criminal element that necessitate such defense.

TexasCajun wrote:

VoiceofReason wrote:As I stated in another post, I haven’t seen a comment yet that seems to come from someone above a high school level. If this is typical of the people we are up against, I don’t think we need to worry.

Had the last election resulted differently I'd be inclined to agree. We've already made the mistake of underestimating the power of the left to motivate the uninformed. Doing so again would put the blame for further regression on our shoulders.

A mob doesnt have many scholars within its ranks.

Bladed wrote:

Let your legislators know how important the 30.06 law is to the integrity of Texas's CHL program. If these gun control activists don't like Texas Penal Code Section 30.06, maybe they'd prefer we repeal it and become the nineteenth state where no-carry signs have no force of law.

These rocket scientists cant comprehend the written language. The sign in question specifically approves lawful carry on premises.

Last night I watched the bio, "Who Is Harry Nilsson (And Why Is Everybody Talkin' About Him)?" on netflix. It was pretty good; that is until the last few minutes of the documentary when his pal, John Lennon died and Nilsson went into activist mode and started working with the National Coalition to Ban Handguns, which later changed its name to the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence.

This successful, middle aged man went to bed with a sense of financial security, and woke to the fact that he had only $300 to feed his 7 children..... and the documentary only briefly covers this major event in his life in order to include his brief involvement with gun control. I was left confused as to whether Nilsson recovered financially before he died. It was obvious that the producers intended to promote the anti sentiment. I was disappointed as it was a good documentary until this point.

For those of you who may not know, Harry Nilsson was a very prolific song writer and recording artist. He was a major force. The Beatles considered him the best in the business with songs such as; Everybody's Talkin , One (is the loneliest number), Coconut - way too many to list here.