Search found 1 match

by Skiprr
Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:45 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: A "Not So Smart" "Smart Gun"
Replies: 13
Views: 2560

Re: A "Not So Smart" "Smart Gun"

This is such a bad idea, I have no words. It would be worth at least 30 minutes of satirical YouTube skits, though. Wow.

And what's with the slide stamped "17" and looking every bit like a Glock upper but with no mention of the word "Glock" anywhere? Is there a lawsuit pending, I wonder?

Ya gotta look at the company's rudimentary website to read about the full set of "features": http://safetyfirstarms.com/. One of my favorites is that the grip safety, if released, will re-lock the gun in less than a third of a second, requiring the entry of the PIN again for it to function. Heaven forbid you get into a defensive situation and need to swap the gun to your non-dominant hand. Oops.

And I run some optics on rifles that require batteries, but I always also have BUIS. This thing requires a battery to fire. What could ever go wrong?

Oh, and the estimated price when it's released in two years? Only $1,295! What a steal for a functionally-impeded non-Glock Glock!

Return to “A "Not So Smart" "Smart Gun"”