Have you been reading this thread?thetexan wrote:This goes back to a person's sovereignty over his own property. Simply stating your wish that no guns allowed should be enough. A better question is why a specified script for a sign. Why shouldn't a sign that says 'no guns allowed' carry the same weight as my telling you no guns allowed? That's the real question. The fact that I must use specific wording in a sign of enumerated specification infringes more on my sovereignty over my own property and my associated property rights than it infringes on your right to carry a gun on my property. The constitutional right to carry a gun never trumped my control of my own property or my ability to demand conditions upon which entry thereto is based.
tex
Search found 1 match
Return to “Why does verbal warning trump compliant signage?”
- Sun Jul 03, 2016 9:52 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Why does verbal warning trump compliant signage?
- Replies: 68
- Views: 15158